> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.onspatial.org/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.onspatial.org/start-here/the-moment.md).

# Why now is the right time

Why 2026 is the year a syndicated credit market for tokenized real-world assets became possible, told through the three conditions it depended on.

A market like Spatial needed three conditions together. Tokenized stocks had to become a normal on-chain asset carrying a price contracts could rely on. There had to be genuine borrowing demand against RWAs, at meaningful size. And existing lending designs had to leave room that a different design could occupy. In 2024 not one of these held. Today every one of them does.

## What pooled lending cannot do

Almost all on-chain lending against RWAs runs through pools, such as Aave Horizon, Morpho vaults and Kamino. Pools carry three structural limits that parameter tuning will never fix:

* Every borrower is priced off one utilisation curve, regardless of the collateral posted.
* A bad loan is paid for by all the pool's suppliers together.
* Assets lacking deep liquidity have to be tightly capped or excluded.

None of that bothers treasuries or index ETFs. It all bothers a holder of one mid-cap stock token who wants credit for 30 days at a rate a particular lender would accept. What that holder needs is pricing per loan, a term that ends, and risk that remains with the party who chose it. Spatial is built to be exactly that, as the page on [the eight design rules](/start-here/eight-rules.md) explains one rule at a time.

## July 2026: the obstacle removed

Robinhood Chain launched its mainnet on 1 July 2026. It is the only place where a regulated broker issues tokenized stocks as ordinary ERC-20s on an L2, backed one to one, with Chainlink feeds pricing them 24/5, plus account abstraction under ERC-4337 and contract deployment open to anyone. Robinhood describes these tokens as suitable for "lending pools and trading collateral". The longer argument lives in [why Robinhood Chain](/the-network/the-case-for-robinhood-chain.md).

## How big tokenized stocks have become

Excluding stablecoins, transferable RWAs on public chains stood near $7.9B at the end of 2024, near $21B at the start of 2026, and near $38.7B now. Tokenized stocks are the fastest growing category in that figure, going from around $424M in mid-2025 to around $2.59B in August 2026. Sources vary by roughly 20 percent, largely because they disagree on counting assets that cannot be transferred.

| Category                | Transferable value on-chain | Behind the figure                                                                                           |
| ----------------------- | --------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Tokenized stocks**    | **\~$2.6B**                 | Ondo Stocks over $1B TVL; xStocks over $25B of cumulative volume; issued by Robinhood, Coinbase and Binance |
| Tokenized US Treasuries | \~$16.0B                    | USDY $2.2B, BUIDL $2.8B, BENJI \~$2.4B, USYC $2.9B                                                          |
| Tokenized credit        | \~$7.5B distributed         | Roughly $35B once "represented" assets that cannot be transferred, Figure HELOCs for instance, are counted  |
| Commodities             | \~$3.1B                     | XAUT, PAXG                                                                                                  |
| Real estate             | \~$175M                     |                                                                                                             |
| VC and private equity   | \~$1.6B                     |                                                                                                             |
| Stablecoins             | \~$303B                     | The settlement layer underneath every other row                                                             |

Source: rwa.xyz, data as of 28 August 2026.

## Demand to borrow against RWAs

Across DeFi, total deposits fell roughly 15 percent over the year. RWA deposits into DeFi lending went the other way and tripled, reaching $7.4B (CoinShares, Q2 2026).

* **Aave Horizon**: by mid-2026, around $540M supplied and $163M borrowed against treasury and CLO tokens, with access permissioned.
* **Morpho**: RWA deposits rose from almost nothing to around $400M during 2025, reached roughly $875M on Avalanche by March 2026, and $80M to $90M is already deployed on Robinhood Chain.
* **Solana stock-token collateral** (Kamino, Jupiter Lend): around $53M by late July 2026. The figure is low because of structure, not appetite. Pooled markets are forced to keep single-stock exposure tightly capped.

For scale, US margin debt on its own is above $900B, and securities-backed lending worldwide runs into the trillions, nearly all of it supplied to wealthy clients by private banks and prime brokers.

## Lessons from earlier RWA credit

The last cycle showed plainly what fails: unsecured loans to borrowers no one could examine, covenants a chain has no means to enforce, concentration in a handful of obligors, and wrapper prices that could be manipulated. Spatial only writes overcollateralised loans, secured by liquid on-chain collateral with an oracle price. Recovery is a contract-run liquidation rather than a court claim. Each episode is examined in [the precedents the design responds to](/risk-and-safeguards/precedents.md).


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the following URL with the `ask` and `goal` query parameters:

```
GET https://docs.onspatial.org/start-here/the-moment.md?ask=<question>&goal=<user_goal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is what the user is ultimately trying to achieve, the reason they need the answer. Sharing it helps GitBook give you a better, more relevant answer. A goal is most helpful when it describes the outcome the user wants rather than restating the question. For example, with `ask=how do I create an API token`, a goal like `automate deployments from our CI pipeline` lets GitBook tailor the answer to that use case.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
